Sunday, September 05, 2010
 
  Minimize

Welcome to our blog.  We hope to add value to everyone by answering your questions and posting interesting topics. We look forward to you participating in our blog and learning from each other.

 Dave, Vera, Greg

Welcome to our blog.  We hope to add value to everyone by answering your questions and posting interesting topics. We look forward to you participating in our blog and learning from each other.

 Dave, Vera, Greg

Print  

Blog List Minimize
Print  

Blog Archives Minimize
Archive
<September 2010>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293012
3456789
Monthly
October, 2008
Print  

Search Blog Minimize
Print  

View_Blog Minimize
Oct 19

Written by: Vera Mefford
10/19/2008 7:37 PM 

To put this question into proper context, we need to review some background information first. The capacity to take joy in life is closely linked to biology & genetics. Studies have shown that a person is likely to be happier, according to the degree of electrical activity produced by the pre-frontal cortex of the brain. Even in studies of identical twins, it was discovered that each individual has a natural happiness level, and a person’s “average” level is almost always inherited. But this does not mean we are stuck with nature’s levels. We can rise above our natural level by practicing habits that encourage happiness & discourage unhappiness.
True happiness is what everyone is looking for – it is what makes life worthwhile, but it seems very elusive for most of us. There is opportunity to be grateful for our many inherent blessings and to see the good in everything, but generally, we do just the opposite. We usually do not miss any opportunity to be unhappy. This is easy, because our mind is activated and springs to life by focusing on deficiencies or what’s wrong. As we were growing up, we learned that some things and actions can harm us (remember not to put your fingers or hand on the hot stove) – so we tend to focus on dangers & potential dangers. However, we can consciously choose to be happy, regardless of our circumstances. In really intense moments of happiness, there is no thinking involved; these kinds of moments are pure and empty of thoughts – they are sometimes called “perfect” moments.
Psychologists generally define happiness as a state of subjective well-being – an inner feeling of harmony, balance and contentment. When you are happy, you like yourself, you are satisfied with your life, and you get pleasure out of each moment on a daily basis. This is living fully, in the present. Peaks of happiness, like falling in love or winning the lottery are intense, but short-lived. Happiness comes down to simply being content most of the time. That is what’s most important – how often you’re happy, not how intensely. Many factors that we may associate with happiness – good fortune, wealth fame – are not really connected to happiness at all. Research in Europe and the US has found little or no correlation between income and happiness. Good news, like a promotion at work makes us happy for a short while, then we adapt. Bad news, like a divorce or a loved one’s death makes us sad for a while, then we adapt. The mechanism of adaptation explains why people can be happy again even after experiencing a tragedy.
Most of our lives are full of routines, but we should not allow ourselves to get into the habit of taking anything for granted. Consider that if you have a roof over your head, you are better off than 75% of the world’s population. If you currently have even $15.00 to your name, you are better off than 85% of all people on earth. We can definitely benefit from practicing being more grateful, and we can choose to have a grateful attitude.
Now, there are several specific components involved in being happy. A 2002 study conducted at the University of Illinois by Edward Diener (a.k.a. Dr. Happiness) & Martin Seligman found that the most prominent characteristics shared by the 10% of students with the highest levels of happiness and the fewest signs of depression were their strong ties to friends and family and their commitment to spending time with them. “It is important to work on social skills, close interpersonal ties and social support in order to be happy,” concludes Diener. Psychologist Martin Seligman, at the University of Pennsylvania and past President of the American Psychological Association (1998) set out to explore what actively makes people feel fulfilled, engaged, and meaningfully happy. Optimism emerged as a strong trait, as well as a feeling of complete engagement in a creative or playful activity, when a person becomes one with what they are doing. This is described as a happy state of mind called “flow” by Hungarian-born psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi.
Of course there are different types of happiness, ranging from deep ecstasy to enjoyment of daily routines. As human beings, we all experience emotional highs and lows, life’s peaks and valleys. This indicates that happiness is not a static but rather a dynamic state. In addition to this, happiness is inherently subjective, and these two components make it more difficult to measure.
 
Our axiological value-judgment based assessments are not capable of measuring degree to which someone savors sensory experiences, or fleeting pleasures, but we can and do measure significant factors that contribute to our happiness.
From a list of 64 basic measures, those relevant to happiness include:
·         A person’s sensitivity to others and their engagement or depth of involvement with friends, family & co-workers;
·         A person’s identification with their professional and personal roles, and the sense of personal satisfaction and fulfillment derived from actively engaging in these roles;
·         A person’s capacity to listen and communicate effectively with others;
·         Being socially adept and professionally proactive, vs. focusing on deficiencies;
·         Being a problem-solver vs. magnifying problems or others’ deficiencies;
·         A person’s general sense of optimism;
·         How well a person understands their own strengths & weaknesses, and how satisfied they are with themselves;
·         Does a person feel their talents and strengths are being put to good use?
·         Does a person feel self-complacent, or do they desire to improve themselves by learning, doing & achieving more?
·         Is a person optimistic about their life and future?
·         Is a person excited about their life?
·         To what degree does a person spend time doing what they have to, vs. enjoying what they do?
·         Does a person feel that their life is making a positive contribution to the world?
·         Do they feel their life and their roles are meaningful?
·         Does a person have a clear and strong sense of purpose?
·         Do they have a clear sense of self-direction and know where they are going?
·         Does a person feel in control of their life & destiny?
·         Does a person feel their life is close to the ideal they envision mentally?
·         Does a person have good coping strategies when stress or hardships strike?
 
Once these attributes are measured, our focus is to reinforce our client’s strengths and coach them toward experiencing greater levels of happiness and optimism by giving them specific exercises and suggestions that will enable them to lead richer and more fulfilling lives. The dynamic interaction between a person and the world they live in, and progressive stages to developing their capacity to achieve greater versatility and adaptability is fully addressed in our new coaching manual The Playbook for Life.

Copyright ©2008 Vera Mefford

Tags:

9 comment(s) so far...

Re: TVSG Value Assessment

Is TVSG Value Assessment available in Arabic language.
Have u done any reseach to identify cultural influence while answering the HVP or TVSG profile?

By Dhananjay Savarkar on   11/12/2008 2:31 AM

Re: Can the TVSG Value Assessments measure “Happiness”?

Dhananjay, TVSG Value Assessments are not yet available in Arabic; Dr. Leon Pomeroy has done the most to research (over 20 years) cultural influences and how they impact the HVP and other parallel forms. HIs book is entitled "The New Science of Axiological Psychology." This book can be ordered at a special price from the Hartman Institute. Just go to www.hartmaninstitute.org and you can click on publications. It is excellent research done over a 20-yr period in many countries.

By Vera Mefford on   11/17/2008 2:52 PM

Re: Can the TVSG Value Assessments measure “Happiness”?

The Soundness of Hartman’s Formal Axiological Value Hierarchy After spending nearly several years creating new parallel forms of the HVP, I am more convinced than ever that the binary value hierarchy is sound. In fact, I could not create a parallel form without using the logic levels of Hartman’s formal axiological hierarchy. Then, while watching an episode of the history channel’s programs on Einstein’s life, Einstein struggled for over a decade to mathematically prove his theory of relativity. The situation in formal axiology is similar. Collectively, we are close to a solution but have not yet presented a formal proof for the value hierarchy - which we know is valid from the success of the HVP. I realized we have a struggle similar to Einstein’s to formally prove Hartman’s value hierarchy. “II is not equal to – but is greater than EI. Moreover, EI is greater than SI.” Hartman said this is true not because of mathematical set-theory which would show these binary combinations as equal, but because of a different, intuitively convincing “mathesis” generated in philosophical value theory. Namely, as most active members of the Hartman Institute are convinced, at the axiom level, we get the following hierarchical relationship among the value dimensions, [S < E < I]. I am interpreting this as an “ordinal” relationship and not necessarily a “cardinal” relationship. In common language, the systemic “word” or label of a thing contains less value than the actual extrinsic “thing” and the extrinsic thing contains less value than the intrinsic “person” who perceives the thing. This relationship does not have to be proved, but rather is the basis of proof. This relationship is accepted at the axiom level and axioms are the foundations of proof, not subject to a proof from some more fundamental or basic truth. We can get a philosophical handle on it with an “in-formal” articulation using a few symbols. SI can represent appreciating and loving my wife’s “high Influence” style of constantly talking to me and communicating with me in the words of two languages, German and English. Now, if I add a series of extrinsic properties to this speaking, communicating entity who is my wife, these do not have to be consumed in the love for the meaning of her systemic words, but the extrinsic adds tone of voice, observable gestures and other activities like great cooking, house cleaning, grooming and the way she looks, etc. I could express this as: {SI [+ Fx]}, where the Fx is a function mapped onto the intrinsic valuation of the systemic properties, expressing her functional, movements, appearance and behaviors which are automatically added onto SI in our shared life-world and is never totally consumed by the content of the SI alone. Therefore, SI can only be equal to EI if I add observable “functions” to systemic meaning which the SI alone does not do. Thus, it follows that: [SI <  (+ Fx)] = EI (the intrinsic valuation of the systemic is “increased (<)” if and only if we add the properties of the external manifestations of her functional bodily movements and appearances perceived with my five senses). The intrinsic attention to my wife’s words are magnified by her gestures and her behavior in caring for herself and for both of us in what she does in working, cooking, etc. Now, if we take {[SI>  (+Fx)] = EI} as our external or total extrinsic property set, there are an infinite number of possibilities of variation with my wife as the conversation develops and continues. I also really love my wife as a person with feelings, needs and desires - and if she says something or does something that may hurt my feelings or tend to insult me in any way, I would likely completely overlook that because I love her as my unique companion and trusted friend (I can and do choose to cancel certain properties). This love I have for her adds another level of intrinsic richness to our life situation and we then have: ([SI<  (+ Fx)] = EI) & ([EI<  (+ Lx)] = II), where “Lx” is my holistic embracing of her total being - in love. If we use axiomatic set-theory, we can generate formal expressions for this in-formal explanation and we have our proof. What do you think?

Dr. Dave Mefford

By Dr Dave Mefford on   12/12/2008 5:40 PM

Re: Can the TVSG Value Assessments measure “Happiness”?

I am working on the Rise and Compass and wanted to see if I could get a good explanation exactly how you would describe what they are, what they do, and how they would benefit a company?

By dannyflynn on   12/2/2008 4:42 PM

Re: the RISE and the Compass

The RISE Profile is a 64 question assessment of a companies view of itself. We geneally assess the executive team to see their own estimate of how well the company is doing in the market. The results are in 4 categories, the three basic dimensions of formal axiology plus the executives view of the interface with their market. The Compass is an assessment of the company from the customer's point of view. When we first tried it out with a large manufacturing company, we assessed their primany customers to guage the company's resonance from center of the market. A comparision of the two, namely the RISE and the Compass reveals gaps in valuation between the company's view of itself and the view of the company by the primary market customers. Then, we can analyze communication channels and concentrate the market message on those channels (thirtten of them) where the company is missing resonance with its market.

By Dr. Dave Mefford on   12/12/2008 5:34 PM

Re: Can the TVSG Value Assessments measure “Happiness”?


christian louboutin--louboutin--christian louboutin--louboutin shoes--christian louboutin boots--lv handbags--mbt shoes--christian louboutin--nike shoes--cheap nike shoes--discount nike shoes--nike shoes sale--Jimmy choo--Jimmy choo shoes--cheap Jimmy choo--discount Jimmy choo--Jimmy choo shoes sale--moncler women--cheap moncler women--discount moncler women--moncler women sale--Manolo Blahnik--Manolo Blahnik shoes--cheap Manolo Blahnik--discount Manolo Blahnik--Manolo Blahnik sale--moncler men--cheap moncler men--discount moncler men--moncler men sale--Balmain Shoes--cheap Balmain Shoes--discount Balmain Shoes--Balmain Shoes sale--moncler kids--cheap moncler kids--discount moncler kids--moncler kids sale--Yves saint Laurent--Yves saint Laurent shoes--cheap Yves saint Laurent--discount Yves saint Laurent--Yves saint Laurent sale--cheap mbt shoes--discount mbt shoes--mbt shoes sale--Ed Hardy--Ed Hardy shoes--cheap Ed Hardy--discount Ed Hardy--Ed Hardy sale--UGG boots--cheap UGG boots--discount UGG boots--UGG boots sale--Alexander McQueen--Alexander McQueen shoes--cheap Alexander McQueen--discount Alexander McQueen--Alexander McQueen sale--Chanel Shoes--cheap Chanel Shoes--discount Chanel Shoes--Chanel Shoes sale--Gucci Shoes--cheap Gucci Shoes--discount Gucci Shoes--Gucci Shoes sale--Tory Burch Shoes--Tory Burch--cheap Tory Burch Shoes--discount Tory Burch Shoes--Tory Burch Shoes sale--Lanvin Shoes--cheap Lanvin Shoes--Lanvin Shoes--Lanvin Shoes sale--Bottega Veneta--Bottega Veneta shoes--cheap Bottega Veneta--discount Bottega Veneta--Bottega Veneta sale--

By D on   4/8/2010 3:16 AM

Re: Can the TVSG Value Assessments measure “Happiness”?

This is interesting and my question is really to understand what are the commercial applications for this product and how does it copare to other profiles available on the market?

I would be interested in finding out more.

Thanks for your help in advance.

Howard

By Howard the Hypnotherapist on   4/20/2010 6:51 AM

Re: Can the TVSG Value Assessments measure “Happiness”?

Why the hell don't you clean this mess up. What are are all these unrelkated limks doing on here?

By Get Focused on   7/23/2010 2:55 PM

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 

Copyright 2007 by The Value Source Group LLC Terms Of Use Privacy Statement